April 14, 2009
Doubt (2008)
Rating 3.5/5
There was a lot of buzz about this film and I kind of understand after watching it. This is a good film, but nowhere near one of the best pictures of the year.
It’s hard for me to discuss what I liked about the film without spoiling the ending. All I can say is that the moral struggle of the ending, between the priest and the nun, is very well done. The film presents an interesting moral dilemma and shows how the parties involved dealt with it. I also like how the film deals with the racial complexities experienced by minorities in the face of the Catholic Church. This is exemplified in the scene where Meryl Streep confronts Viola Davis. This is the best scene of the entire film and is very complex and moving.
This is a film worth watching and it will lead to some interesting post-credits discussion.

Doubt (2008)

Rating 3.5/5

There was a lot of buzz about this film and I kind of understand after watching it. This is a good film, but nowhere near one of the best pictures of the year.

It’s hard for me to discuss what I liked about the film without spoiling the ending. All I can say is that the moral struggle of the ending, between the priest and the nun, is very well done. The film presents an interesting moral dilemma and shows how the parties involved dealt with it. I also like how the film deals with the racial complexities experienced by minorities in the face of the Catholic Church. This is exemplified in the scene where Meryl Streep confronts Viola Davis. This is the best scene of the entire film and is very complex and moving.

This is a film worth watching and it will lead to some interesting post-credits discussion.

Comments (View)
Entre les Murs (2008)
Rating 4.5/5
I should have watched this earlier, as it is clearly one of the best films of 2008. I’ve been busy with school and on Saturday I was finally able to check this one out at a local art-house cinema.
I loved almost every aspect of this film. It creates a realistic portrayal of the educational system in urban France. It deals with the complexity of the classroom in a city with chidlren from different ethic and socio-economic backgrounds. Something that I really appreciated about the film is that it showed these children as having some promise despite all the factors that prevent them from having a conventional, western education.
The film is well shot, with a cinema verite feel that makes the viewer feel as if they are actively watching the classroom in the picture.
The viewer feels for the main character and teacher as they struggle to inspire and educate the children. This is difficult for them to ‘do good’ in the classroom as their notions of good are different from the students’ notions.
I highly recommend watching this film, it is worth your time. If you like this film, check out The 400 Blows (if you haven’t seen this classic already). Both offer interesting insight into the education system in France.

Entre les Murs (2008)

Rating 4.5/5

I should have watched this earlier, as it is clearly one of the best films of 2008. I’ve been busy with school and on Saturday I was finally able to check this one out at a local art-house cinema.

I loved almost every aspect of this film. It creates a realistic portrayal of the educational system in urban France. It deals with the complexity of the classroom in a city with chidlren from different ethic and socio-economic backgrounds. Something that I really appreciated about the film is that it showed these children as having some promise despite all the factors that prevent them from having a conventional, western education.

The film is well shot, with a cinema verite feel that makes the viewer feel as if they are actively watching the classroom in the picture.

The viewer feels for the main character and teacher as they struggle to inspire and educate the children. This is difficult for them to ‘do good’ in the classroom as their notions of good are different from the students’ notions.

I highly recommend watching this film, it is worth your time. If you like this film, check out The 400 Blows (if you haven’t seen this classic already). Both offer interesting insight into the education system in France.

Comments (View)

My Rating System

5/5- Reserved of Classics or films that I consider masterpieces

4/5- A great film

3/5- A good film, worth watching

2/5- A decent film

1/5- A bad film

0/5- Something that is absolutely awful

Comments (View)
April 11, 2009

10 Actors to Watch

Same as before.

1) Marlon Brando

Apocalypse Now, A Streetcar Named Desire, On the Waterfront.

2) Charlie Chaplin

City Lights, Gold Rush, Modern Times.

3) Daniel Day Lewis

My Left Foot, There Will Be Blood, The Unbearable Lightness of Being.

4) Robert DeNiro

The Godfather Part II, Raging Bull, Taxi Driver.

5) Clint Eastwood

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, A Fistful of Dollars, Unforgiven.

6) Klaus Kinski

Aguirre, the Wrath of God, Fitzcarraldo, Nosferatu.

7) Marcello Mastroianni

La Dolce Vita, 8 1/2.

8) Robert Mitchum

Cape Fear, The Night of the Hunter, Out of the Past.

9) Philip Seymour Hoffman

Capote, Magnolia, Synecdoche, NY.

10) Max von Sydow

The Seventh Seal, The Virgin Spring, Winter Light.

Comments (View)
April 10, 2009

10 Directors to Watch

It’s hard to do Top 10 lists, but this is a list of my favourite directors. With each director I list the three best movies that they have done. This is tough to do because there are still tons of films I haven’t seen and my opinion could change easily. Comments are welcome… so is criticism.

(the directors are in alphabetical order, so are the films… not the order of importance)

1) Wes Anderson

Bottle Rocket, Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums.

2) Ingmar Bergman

Persona, The Seventh Seal, Wild Strawberries.

3) Luis Bunuel

Un Chien Andalou, The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie, Los Olvidados.

4) John Cassavetes

A Woman Under the Influence, The Killing of a Chinese Bookie, Shadows.

5) Federico Fellini

Amacord, La Dolce Vita, 8 1/2.

6) Stanley Kubrick

Dr. Strangelove, Spartacus, 2001: A Space Odyssey

7) Werner Herzog

Aguirre, the Wrath of God, Fitzcarraldo, Grizzly Man.

8) Akira Kurosawa

Rashomon, Seven Samurai, Yojimbo.

9) David Lynch

Blue Velvet, Eraserhead, Mulholland Dr.

10) Guy Maddin

Brand Upon the Brain! My Winnipeg, The Saddest Music in the World.

Honorable Mention: Lars von Trier. He is so great and so unique. With a few more films under his belt, von Trier will be every bit as good as these great directors. I love his approach to filmmaking.

Comments (View)
April 1, 2009
There is something so awesome about this picture… and so crazy about Klaus Kinski. Herzog and Kinski collaborated on some of the greatest films of all time.

There is something so awesome about this picture… and so crazy about Klaus Kinski. Herzog and Kinski collaborated on some of the greatest films of all time.

Comments (View)
Review- Let the Right One In (2007)
Rating- 3/5
I just finished watching this film and I really don’t get what all the hype was about. I have a secret love for vampire and zombie movies, but this one is slightly above average. The film works in the sense that it is grim and dark while also having several humorous moments. Beyond that, I didn’t really find that much more to the film.
I think that my major issue with the film was the dialogue. I do, however, feel that the issue here is more of a translation problem. I started watching the film in subtitles (I hate dubbed films) but switched back and forth between dubbed and titles to see which gave a richer dialogue. I found the dialogue to be boring and it got on my nerves, perhaps it was intended to do so, or perhaps it was a translation issue. Maybe they were just quiet children/vampires that really had little to say. I have no answer to this, but I found that it took away from an otherwise promising film.
I did like the film for its darkness and interesting storyline. There are a lot of interesting elements in it that make it a decent film worth watching late at night. Perhaps if I spoke Swedish I would have really enjoyed it.

Review- Let the Right One In (2007)

Rating- 3/5

I just finished watching this film and I really don’t get what all the hype was about. I have a secret love for vampire and zombie movies, but this one is slightly above average. The film works in the sense that it is grim and dark while also having several humorous moments. Beyond that, I didn’t really find that much more to the film.

I think that my major issue with the film was the dialogue. I do, however, feel that the issue here is more of a translation problem. I started watching the film in subtitles (I hate dubbed films) but switched back and forth between dubbed and titles to see which gave a richer dialogue. I found the dialogue to be boring and it got on my nerves, perhaps it was intended to do so, or perhaps it was a translation issue. Maybe they were just quiet children/vampires that really had little to say. I have no answer to this, but I found that it took away from an otherwise promising film.

I did like the film for its darkness and interesting storyline. There are a lot of interesting elements in it that make it a decent film worth watching late at night. Perhaps if I spoke Swedish I would have really enjoyed it.

Comments (View)
March 31, 2009

Europa (1991)

If you’re looking to check out a film that is completely unique, check out Lars Von Trier’s Europa. Von Trier is a stylistic genius and that is certainly clear in this film; Von Trier uses experimental techniques in Europa such as interactions with rear projected footage… its really cool to watch. The film is deep and profound and will leave you thinking afterwards, but what I love most about the film is its style.

The plot of this film unravels like a nightmare; it has a disjointed style that isn’t traditional linear plot progression. The film is best watched late at night to really make it feel like a dream.

Von Trier considers this one of his masterpieces… when he wasn’t awarded the Palm d’Or (it was given to the Coen’s Barton Fink, which is a great film but not as good as this one) he gave the judges the finger and stormed out.

Comments (View)
March 11, 2009

Battleship Potemkin (1925)

An all time classic from Sergei Eisenstein that depicts the mutiny of a battleship by Russian soldiers who are rebelling against the tyranny of the Tsarist regime. Eisenstein is famous for creating “montage” which is cutting different scenes together to create a new conclusion; montage is an idea that arises from the collision of independent shots wherein each sequential element is perceived not next to the other, but on top of the other. A+B=C.

The video above is the famous Odessa Steps Sequence. The scene depicting a massacre of innocent civilians was used as a propaganda tool to denounce the tyranny of the Tsar. This event never acutually happened; however, after seeing the film many people believe it was a real event. Look at the quick cuts and editing in this sequence… they are perfect and demonstrate the power of montage.

Comments (View)
March 10, 2009
byronic:

2009 #37, Synecdoche, New York (dir. Charlie Kaufman, 2008)
Time elapsed between final credits and desire to watch again: 1 minute.
Agreed.

byronic:

2009 #37, Synecdoche, New York (dir. Charlie Kaufman, 2008)

Time elapsed between final credits and desire to watch again: 1 minute.

Agreed.

Comments (View)

Inland Empire(2006)

If you like David Lynch, especially if you like his obscure surreal work, you will most likely consider this is one of his finest films. This is a labyrinth film that will have you thinking and putting pieces together long after the film ends. Lynch said that the film is a mystery, which is very true. It is a combination of several themes and ideas he had been working on and he put them together while shooting… The result is this film. I’m under the impression that there is no solution to this film; however, I feel that is what makes it great. I’ve watched it twice and my mind was fully active both times attempting to put the pieces together (sometimes successfully, sometimes not). I love films in which the ultimate meaning needs to be put together, or sometimes doesn’t exist. The beauty of good cinema is its capacity to make you think.

I’m not a huge fan of digital filming; however, I really enjoyed it in this case. I’m partial to older silent techniques, but Lynch clearly uses the digital medium to his advantage here. It is hard to watch at first, but once you get used to it you can really appreciate the images and the special effects in the film. Lynch stated that he will never use film again… It will be interesting to see his next works.

Comments (View)
March 6, 2009

Very Nice, Very Nice (1961)

This is a powerful film that needs to be watched several times.

Arthur Lipsett created this masterpiece and it is an avant-garde combination of photography and sound. It looks behind the business-as-usual face we put on life and shows anxieties we want to forget. The film is a combination of sound clips and images from unused film. He blends the images and sound together to create a unique version of modern life and society in cities. The sound and images are cut together to create what you see, a film that invokes strong emotional reactions. Its funny and horrifying… what more could you ask for from a Canadian film?

Comments (View)

Paul Tomkowicz, Street Railway Switchman. (1953)

I’ve had a great time this week going through the NFB collection and looking at some of the films I’ve studied. This is a short film made during the 1950’s as part of a series that attempted to look at the diverse faces of Canada. The directors chose to document and follow the daily life of an immigrant in Winnipeg. The film doesn’t outright say it, however, it is implied several times that Paul is a Jew and was forced to leave and abandon his family. The NFB at the time had a ‘cultivated innocence’ (coined by G. Evans) which meant that films suggested deeper meanings, however, for political reasons were never fully followed through on. This film shows several contentious points that could be presented, but the film simply shows the man and his life, not the controversy that could surround it.

The film is also interesting for its camera work. This was one of the first times that cameras were mobile, so it allows the cameraman to follow Paul during the evenning. This is also one of the first films shot at night which created some difficulties, however, the end result is quite stunning. Also pay attention to the inside vs. outside motif in the picture. It is a true statement of the immigrant experience.

For better quality see:

http://www.nfb.ca/film/paul_tomkowicz_street_railway_switchman/

Comments (View)
March 5, 2009
branduponthebrain:

auteurasaurus:

Rashômon (Akira Kurosawa, 1950)
“Rashomon expands the mythical, rural universe glimpsed at the end of Stray Dog and, in doing so, clarifies it as a mere deflection of the noir anxieties that haunted that film, producing the most idiosyncratic narrative structure since Citizen Kane, and evoking a crisis in masculinity that has reached epic, apocalyptic proportions. To this end, Kurosawa conflates two iconic short stories by Rynosuke Atukagawa, opening with an abstracted encounter between a woodcutter (Takashi Shimura), priest (Minoru Chiaki) and peasant (Kichijiro) at the Gate of Rashomon, during which a series of pessimistic denunciations and reflections (“War, earthquakes, giant winds, fires, famine, plague - each year is full of disasters”) give way to the priest and woodcutter’s recollections of a recent trial, in which a samurai’s (Masayuki Mori) body was discovered stabbed, and they were required to provide evidence as eyewitnesses, along with the samurai’s wife (Machiko Koyu), a bandit (Toshiro Mifune), and the samurai himself, through a medium (Fumika Homna). Unlike Kane, all four stories conflict, and are never resolved - although, given that each party describes themselves as the culprit, the focus quickly shifts away from the act of murder itself, settling on the dynamic between the samurai, his wife, and the bandit, and, more specifically, the degree and location of emasculation involved, to the extent that it feels as if the most palpable spectral presence is not the samurai, nor the collective memory of his murder, but a mocking, emasculating laugh against which everybody seems anxious to defend themselves, and whose implications are encapsulated in the final rendition of the crime, in which the samurai and bandit’s fight reached its pitiful, cowardly, childish apex, and the latter is forced to over-compensate with a monstrous display of bravado that horrifies the woman, and sits well with Mifune’s hyperbolic acting style. This produces the claustrophobia of a two-dimensional painting, reinforced by the circumscription of the action to three settings - the Rashomon gate, trial courtyard, and forest - as well as by Kazuo Miyagawa’s cinematographic evocations of the latter’s sweaty, sub-tropical humidity, encompassing rapid, extended pans, artful dappling of shadows, and, most strikingly, a tendency to shoot directly into the sun, all of which imbue every movement with a balletic grace, and draw a deep veil of silence over the proceedings; the common denominator between the wife’s concealed face, and the ceaseless rain that hems in the Rashomon gate.”

branduponthebrain:

auteurasaurus:

Rashômon (Akira Kurosawa, 1950)

“Rashomon expands the mythical, rural universe glimpsed at the end of Stray Dog and, in doing so, clarifies it as a mere deflection of the noir anxieties that haunted that film, producing the most idiosyncratic narrative structure since Citizen Kane, and evoking a crisis in masculinity that has reached epic, apocalyptic proportions. To this end, Kurosawa conflates two iconic short stories by Rynosuke Atukagawa, opening with an abstracted encounter between a woodcutter (Takashi Shimura), priest (Minoru Chiaki) and peasant (Kichijiro) at the Gate of Rashomon, during which a series of pessimistic denunciations and reflections (“War, earthquakes, giant winds, fires, famine, plague - each year is full of disasters”) give way to the priest and woodcutter’s recollections of a recent trial, in which a samurai’s (Masayuki Mori) body was discovered stabbed, and they were required to provide evidence as eyewitnesses, along with the samurai’s wife (Machiko Koyu), a bandit (Toshiro Mifune), and the samurai himself, through a medium (Fumika Homna). Unlike Kane, all four stories conflict, and are never resolved - although, given that each party describes themselves as the culprit, the focus quickly shifts away from the act of murder itself, settling on the dynamic between the samurai, his wife, and the bandit, and, more specifically, the degree and location of emasculation involved, to the extent that it feels as if the most palpable spectral presence is not the samurai, nor the collective memory of his murder, but a mocking, emasculating laugh against which everybody seems anxious to defend themselves, and whose implications are encapsulated in the final rendition of the crime, in which the samurai and bandit’s fight reached its pitiful, cowardly, childish apex, and the latter is forced to over-compensate with a monstrous display of bravado that horrifies the woman, and sits well with Mifune’s hyperbolic acting style. This produces the claustrophobia of a two-dimensional painting, reinforced by the circumscription of the action to three settings - the Rashomon gate, trial courtyard, and forest - as well as by Kazuo Miyagawa’s cinematographic evocations of the latter’s sweaty, sub-tropical humidity, encompassing rapid, extended pans, artful dappling of shadows, and, most strikingly, a tendency to shoot directly into the sun, all of which imbue every movement with a balletic grace, and draw a deep veil of silence over the proceedings; the common denominator between the wife’s concealed face, and the ceaseless rain that hems in the Rashomon gate.”

Comments (View)

(So it plays on site… still, visit the NFB site, there are hours of great films there.. www.nfb.ca)

Comments (View)